īooth TC et al (2012) Management of incidental findings during imaging research in “healthy” volunteers: current UK practice. Special issue devoted to the Great Ape Project:142–154īlakemore C et al (2012) Implementing the 3Rs in neuroscience research: a reasoned approach. Altern Lab Anim: ATLA 45(2):91–99īirnbacher D (1996) The great apes – why they have a right to life. īeuter A (2017) The use of neurocomputational models as alternatives to animal models in the development of electrical brain stimulation treatments. MIT Press, Cambridgeīennett AJ, Ringach DL (2016) Animal research in neuroscience: a duty to engage. īeckoff M, Jamison D (eds) (1996) Readings in animal psychology. KeywordsĪnderson M, Anderson SL (2007) Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent. We will review the debate on disclosure of incidental findings in neuroimaging, discuss the ambivalent role of neuroscience research for informing the ethical standards of animal testing, and finally turn to the debate about responsible research communication and interdisciplinary trespassing in a time of increased public interest in neuroscience research and imagination about its potential social and cultural consequences. These topics will be the focus of this chapter. While topics such as the ethics of test-person recruitment and informed consent procedures, ethics of data sharing and authorship, responsibility for dual use of research results, or the role of ethical review boards are to a large part coextensive with questions in research ethics in other areas of the life sciences, there are still a number of topics distinctive of neuroscience research ethics. Ethical questions concerning the research process in neuroscience have, however, been largely neglected. Yet, the neuroethical discourse has primarily focused on ethical, legal, and social implications of the products of neuroscience research, such as clinical interventions and neuro-technologies.
With the rise of neuroethics as a research field of its own since the early 2000s, ethical questions concerning the neurosciences have become a major focus of bioethical debate.
0 kommentar(er)
